Nash equilibrium without mutual knowledge of rationality
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mutual Knowledge of Rationality in the Electronic Mail Game
This paper reexamines the paradoxical aspect of the electronic mail game (Rubinstein, 1989). The electronic mail game is a coordination game with payoff uncertainty. At a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the game, players cannot achieve the desired coordination of actions even when a high order of mutual knowledge of payoff functions obtains. We want to make explicit the role of knowledge about rat...
متن کاملCommunication Leading to Nash Equilibrium without Acyclic Condition (S4-Knowledge Model Case)
The purpose of this paper is to present the pre-play communication-process leading to a Nash equilibrium of a strategic form game. The stage sets up as follows: The players start with the same prior distribution on a finite state-space. In addition they have the private information given by the non-partition structure corresponding to the modal logic S4. Each player communicates privately his/h...
متن کاملNash equilibrium
In game theory, Nash equilibrium (named after John Forbes Nash, who proposed it) is a solution concept of a game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only his own strategy unilaterally. If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing his or...
متن کاملRefinements of Nash Equilibrium
In game theory, “refinement” refers to the selection of a subset of equilibria, typically on the grounds that the selected equilibria are more plausible than other equilibria. These notes are a brief, largely informal, survey of some of the most heavily used refinements. Throughout, “equilibria” means Nash equilibria (NE), unless I state otherwise explicitly. And throughout, I assume that the g...
متن کاملArbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium
No-arbitrage is the fundamental principle of economic rationality which unifies normative decision theory, game theory, and market theory. In economic environments where money is available as a medium of measurement and exchange, no-arbitrage is synonymous with subjective expected utility maximization in personal decisions, competitive equilibria in capital markets and exchange economies, and c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economic Theory
سال: 1999
ISSN: 0938-2259,1432-0479
DOI: 10.1007/s001990050344